Intracutaneous irritation assessment of a zirconia barrier material (Zirbone) for bone augmentation: rabbit study according to ISO 10993-10:2010 and ISO 10993-12:2021

Abstract

Zirconia barriers have been proposed as an alternative to titanium meshes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) and bone augmentation, but systematic biocompatibility testing is required before clinical use. This study evaluated the intracutaneous irritation potential of a zirconia barrier device (Zirbone) according to ISO 10993‑10. Polar (physiological saline) and non‑polar (cottonseed oil) extracts of Zirbone were prepared in accordance with ISO 10993‑10 and ISO 10993‑12 at an extraction ratio of 3 cm²/mL for 72 ± 2 h at 37 ± 1 °C under gentle agitation. Three young, healthy New Zealand albino rabbits (same sex, ≥ 2 kg) were used. For each animal, 0.2 mL of polar and non‑polar extracts were injected intracutaneously at five sites on one flank, and 0.2 mL of the corresponding extraction media alone were injected at five sites on the contralateral flank. Erythema and edema were scored at 24, 48 and 72 h using standardized scales, and the primary irritation index (PII) was calculated for each extract by comparison with its control solvent. No erythema or edema was observed at any sites injected with the polar solvent or polar Zirbone extract during the 72‑h observation period. In contrast, very slight to well‑defined erythema without edema was observed at sites injected with the non‑polar solvent and non‑polar Zirbone extract at all time points in all animals. The PII was 0.00 for the polar extract and 0.07 for the non‑polar extract, both well below the ISO 10993‑10 acceptance threshold of 1.0 for non‑irritant materials. These findings indicate that polar and non‑polar extracts of the zirconia barrier device Zirbone are non‑irritant according to ISO 10993‑10 and support its local biocompatibility and potential safe use as a barrier material in GBR and bone augmentation procedures.

https://doi.org/10.11138/oi.v18i1.210
PDF

References

Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81(5):672-6.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198805000-00004

Retzepi M, Donos N. Guided bone regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(6):567-76.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01922.x

Buergers R, Schlegel KA, Wichmann M, Hahnel S. Effects of bone augmentation on implant success and survival: a retrospective analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(2):455-61.

Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017;125(5):315-37.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12364

Her S, Kang T, Fien MJ. Titanium mesh as an alternative to a membrane for ridge augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(4):803-10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.11.017

Rakhmatia YD, Ayukawa Y, Furuhashi A, Koyano K. Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(1):3-14.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2012.12.001

Fontana F, Santoro F, Maiorana C, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Simion M. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(6):1003-12.

Wang HL, Boyapati L. PASS principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006;15(1):8-17.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f

Cucchi A, Vignudelli E, Napolitano A, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19(5):821-32.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12520

Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Marchetti C, Botticelli D. In vivo comparison of customized zirconia barriers in guided bone regeneration. An experimental study. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(6):342.

Bertolai R, Catelani C, Rossi F, et al. In vivo comparison of customized zirconia barriers in guided bone regeneration: an experimental study. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e31750.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32070

Uriarte X, Landázuri A, Marão HF, Lucena N, Schiegnitz E, Díaz L. Zirconia Barriers in Bone Regeneration Procedures: A Scoping Review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Apr;36(4):411-422.

https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14404

Cucchi A, Vignudelli E, Franceschi D, Randellini E, Lizio G, Fiorino A, et al. Customized-3D zirconia barriers for guided bone regeneration (GBR): clinical and histological findings from a proof-of-concept case series. J Oral Implantol. 2021;47(6):463-73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103780

Cucchi A, Vignudelli E, Fiorino A, Pellegrino G, Corinaldesi G. Horizontal augmentation using customized zirconia barriers with and without resorbable membranes: a proof-of-concept prospective case series. Open Dent J. 2024;18:e18742106332436.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10993-10:2010. Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization. Geneva: ISO; 2010.

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10993-12:2021. Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials. Geneva: ISO; 2021.

Malchiodi L, Caricasulo R, Cucchi A, Vinci R, Agliardi E, Gherlone E. Evaluation of ultrashort and longer implants with microrough surfaces: results of a 24- to 36-month prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(1):171-9.

https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4648

Williams DF. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941-53.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Joseph Nammour, Nabih Nader