Knowledge, awareness, and practices of digital prosthodontic technologies among dental professionals in the southern region of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: The integration of digital technologies has fundamentally transformed workflows within prosthodontics through the incorporation of advanced tools such as computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), intraoral scanners (IOSs), and three-dimensional printing (3D). However, a notable gap remains between awareness and actual implementation, predominantly due to financial and educational limitations. Data concerning digital prosthodontics in Saudi Arabia are limited, despite the country's emphasis on digital health initiatives under Vision 2030. This study aims to examine the knowledge, awareness, and practices (KAP) pertaining to digital prosthodontics among dental professionals in Saudi Arabia, and to compare the adoption rates of these technologies between general practitioners and specialists. 

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from May to August 2025, utilizing a validated self-administered questionnaire. Eligible participants included interns, general dentists, specialists, and faculty members from the public, private, and academic sectors within Saudi Arabia. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-square test to evaluate associations between professional level and KAP outcomes. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. 

Results: A total of 204 professionals participated, most of whom were young (<25 years; 51%) and affiliated with academic institutions (53.9%). Although 57.8% of the participants were aware of digital prosthodontics, only 25.5% reported using such technologies in practice. IOSs (48.5%) and CAD/CAM (27%) were the most frequently employed instruments, particularly for crown and bridge restorations. Specialists consistently exhibited higher KAP than general dentists (all p-values < 0.001), and postgraduate training emerged as a key determinant. The primary obstacles were the high initial cost (23%) and lack of training (16.7%). Notably, 79.9% of the respondents expressed interest in structured training, and 72.1% supported curricular integration.

In conclusion, Saudi dental professionals exhibit a moderate level of awareness regarding digital prosthodontics; however, their clinical application predominantly remains within the realm of specialists. The principal barriers comprise financial, educational, and institutional challenges. Opportunities exist to enhance adoption through the promotion of enthusiasm for curricular reforms and training initiatives. By emphasizing structured education, accessible training programs, and cost-sharing strategies, Saudi prosthodontics can advance patient care and align with international digital standards. 

The clinical significance lies in bridging the divide between awareness and the adoption of digital prosthodontics, which is vital for the advancement of clinical practice. Improving educational opportunities and minimizing financial barriers can lead to better patient outcomes, more efficient workflows, and expanded access to digital care outside specialist environments.